Costs – Costs between SBLCs and Commercial LCs usually differ.

At a high level both types of LC typically require an issuer to consider factors such as:

Depending on the laws applicable to the Issuer, there may be different cash reserve loss requirements needed for commercial LCs vs performance SBLCs vs financial SBLCs, (Note: This is the case for all countries following Basel) which may affect the issuing/opening fee.

Both LC types will require an applicant to pay an issuance fee of some type. However, commercial LCs are expected to have at least one, if not multiple document presentations. Each presentation will typically be assessed by an examination fee of some type. Conversely, most SBLCs do not receive a beneficiary’s document presentation or drawing and so no examination related fees will be assessed.

Where a SBLC generally covers longer term and ongoing contracts, the issuance fee is needed for the duration of the SBLC.

Commercial LCs are typically issued to support a single need e.g. to cover a payment for: a) a shipment of goods; or b) services completed. They typically expire earlier than a SBLC.

For applicants and beneficiaries which routinely transact, a longer term SBLC may be the more economical LC undertaking, instead of issuing multiple commercial LCs. The commercial LCs will be assessed multiple issuance and examination fees.

Document presentations – Commercial LCs are a beneficiary’s primary payment option. Rather than relying on the underlying contract for payment, the beneficiary will request payment from the issuer’s independent commercial LC undertaking in settlement of the underlying contract they have with the applicant. Conversely, SBLCs take the opposite view and, in the overwhelming majority of cases, the issuer of a SBLC does not expect to receive a document presentation nor make a payment.

As a secondary payment option to the beneficiary, if a document presentation/demand is received, it generally means that the applicant has failed to meet its terms against the underlying contract.

Document types – Commercial LCs require documentary presentations which usually consist of commercial documents such as commercial invoices, packing or weight lists, transport documents, etc. SBLCs are payable most often against simple beneficiary statements and the documents presented often have no intrinsic value.

Misstatements/Fraud – Understanding the difference with document types outlined above, the possibility of a beneficiary requesting a payment in error, by accident or purposely are greater with a SBLC. While a very rare occurrence, it is recommended that the applicant and beneficiary have an established relationship when dealing with SBLCs.

Duration - Commercial LCs are typically short term in nature and their expiry date is generally 6 months or less. SBLCs most often cover longer term contracts, and their duration may be years in length on an overall basis.

Tenors – Any LC undertaking must define the period when a complying document presentation is due for payment and this period is known as the LC’s tenor. As LC undertakings, both Commercial LCs and SBLC’s can be payable “at sight”. This means upon a reasonable time from when the nominated or issuer has found the documents to comply with an LC’s terms.

Conversely there also exists time tenors, which detail that a payment is to be made at a fixed future certain date from the time a presentation is found to be complying. Time tenors are typically referred to as Deferred Payment Undertakings or Banker’s Acceptances. One term, “Negotiation”, may be used as a sight or time tenor.

Commercial LCs often include some form of financing need for trade and, as such, time tenors are utilized. SBLCs which generally do not expect a presentation or demand for payment will overwhelmingly use the sight tenor.

Terms and Conditions – Given their very different payment needs, the data content of commercial versus SBLCs differs significantly.

Purpose – Commercial LCs facilitate trade and are issued with the intention that a document presentation will be delivered to a bank for payment for a shipment of goods or payment for services.  They are the primary payment vehicle for the beneficiary.

On the other hand, SBLCs cover any type of contract or agreement between two parties.  Provided the issuer is willing to support its applicant, the type of contract a SBLC can support is boundless and includes the different types we covered above (which is not an exhaustive list).

When an applicant does not meet its contracted duty(ies), the beneficiary will make a claim against the applicant for payment under the underlying contract.  When the applicant fails to honour the request for payment, the beneficiary will make a presentation for payment against the SBLC making it a secondary payment vehicle, or payment of last resort for a beneficiary.